Home | ¿Cómo funciona este curso? lea esto lo antes posible | no abra esta páginaTrabajo 1 | Conecciones a otras páginas (links) | Técnicas de Arte | Asignación 1 | Arte Gótico/Asignación 2 | Renacimiento 1300 al 1600 DC | Asignación 3 | Asignación 4 | no abrir | Página | no abrir | Época moderna Introducción | Neoclacicismo | Asig. 5 Impresionismo y Post-Impresionismo | Surrealismo | No abrir esta página (Siglo XX) | Arte del Siglo XX | Asignación 6 Artista Puertorriqeño | Problemas Enviando Asignaciones
Época moderna Introducción
Apreciación al arte 2 Estilos de Arte

La Revolución Industrial y sus Influencias en las Artes

Este periodo ocurrió desde principios del siglo 19 hasta nuestra era. Comienza con los artistas Neoclásicos los cuáles opinaban que el artista debe subordinar sus sentimientos personales a un ideal ético expresado en la forma clásica. Osea un buén artista debe pintar cosas que le enseñe valores a las masas, para educar a estas. Estos artistas gustan de usar temas mitológicos de la antigua Grecia y Roma en sus obras.
Sin embargo esto cambia a medida que las sociedades progresan. El arte había sido influenciado en gran medida por las naciones, guerras, religión y la elite. A mediados del siglo 19 en Francia se comienza a cambiar el tema pintado por los artistas. Ya no son reyes los mayores patrones del arte sino la clase media que va surgiendo derivada del progreso de la industria y el comercio que surgió derivado de la revolución industrial.

Surgen los impresionistas y sus preocupaciones sobre luz y óptica influenciados a gran medida por la fotografía y los realistas, preocupados por las condiciones reales de las personas. Estos últimos comienzan a pintar gente pobre, y las pobrezas traidas a gran medida como resultado de esta revolución industrial.

A principios del siglo XX nuevos personajes aparecen en el arte. Estos no trabajan como es obvio para cortes de reyes ó emperadores sino que trabajan en el mercado de galerías, y esto le permite al artista más libertad de expresión. Los artistas liberados de la necesidad de crear parecidos exactos gracias a la invención de la cámara fotografica comienzan a investigar temas de la mente y composición. A la vanguardi de todos encontramos a Pablo Picasso quién debido a su larga vida y su innovaciones logró mantenerse a la vanguardia desde comienzos del siglo hasta su muerte en el 1972.

Al fondo de esta página encontrará la asignación número 5

napoleon.jpg

David, Jacques-Louis
Napoleon en su Estudio
1812
Oleo en canvas
80 1/4 x 49 1/4 in. (203.9 x 125.1 cm)
The National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

En esta foto hecha por el pintor David ,ese es su apellido, vemos a Napoleón en su estudio. Aunque es un líder moderno el nuevo emperador está rodeado de cosas que nos recuerda la antigua Roma, como las decoraciones en su silla y en su escritorio. Napoleón pensaba que Francia sería como una nueva Roma, poderosa y dueña del mundo. El emperador empleó pintores como David para llevar este mensaje.

lita.jpg

El Juramento de los Horatii

David, Jacques-Louis
El Juramento de los Horatii
1784
Oleo en canvas
130 x 167 1/4 in. (330 x 425 cm)
Musee du Louvre, Paris
Esta pintura representa a unos hermanos que se van a pelear por su patria y a lo mejor jamás regresarán. Sus mujeres lloran al fondo. El emperador esperaba lo mismo de sus ciudadanos. Napoleón esperaba lo mismo de sus tropas.

lita.jpg

Monet, Claude
La cathedrale de Rouen, le portail, temps gris ( Catedral de Rouen , Portal Oeste, Clima Nublado)
fechado 1894, pintado en 1892
Oleo en canvas
39 3/8 x 25 5/8 pulgadas. (100 x 65 cm)
Musee d'Orsay, Paris

lita.jpg


MARCEL DUCHAMP | Fountain | 1917/1964
 
Perhaps no work is more singularly identified with the transformation of art in the twentieth century than Fountain (1917) by Marcel Duchamp (1887-1968). Rejected from an exhibition that was to be open to all works of art sponsored by the Society for Independent Artists in New York, the porcelain urinal was to become the most important and notorious of the "ready-mades," which revolutionized the possibilities for artmaking through their direct use of manufactured consumer products.

Duchamp acquired the lavatory urinal for the original Fountain directly from J. L. Mott Iron Works, a manufacturer of plumbing equipment. Before submitting the piece to the exhibition as sculpture, the artist rotated the urinal ninety degrees from its normal, functional position, and left the piece unimbellished except for the inscription "R. Mutt 1917" (a pseudonym that synthesised the name of the manufacturer and that of the popular comic strip "Mutt and Jeff").

The original Fountain has long since disappeared. In 1964, Duchamp entrusted the Galleria Schwarz in Milan with the production of a signed and numbered edition of his most important ready-mades. Each ready-made was refabricated by a highly exacting craftsperson to exactly replicate the original; the edition for each selection was limited to eight signed examples. The highly esteemed Arturo Schwarz edition of Fountain is the fourth full-scale version of the piece and the one that most closely approximates the lost original.

This is the only edition to be issued under the direct supervision of Duchamp at every stage of the project on the basis of a blueprint derived from photos of the lost original. Marcel Duchamp remains a singular voice in the history of modern art whose formal and conceptual innovations have had vast implications for generations of artists to follow. Other works by Duchamp in the SFMOMA collection are Boîte verte (Green Box), from 1934, and Boîte-en-valise (Box in a Suitcase), from 1938-42.

glazed ceramic with black paint
14 x 19 5/16 x 24 5/8 in. 1/8
Collection SFMOMA
Purchased through a gift of Phyllis Wattis



Copyright © 2000 San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

tomado de artchive

lita.jpg

Text from Thomas Hoving, "Art For Dummies®"

"Yet Cubism and Modern art weren't either scientific or intellectual; they were visual and came from the eye and mind of one of the greatest geniuses in art history. Pablo Picasso, born in Spain, was a child prodigy who was recognized as such by his art-teacher father, who ably led him along. The small Museo de Picasso in Barcelona is devoted primarily to his early works, which include strikingly realistic renderings of casts of ancient sculpture.

"He was a rebel from the start and, as a teenager, began to frequent the Barcelona cafes where intellectuals gathered. He soon went to Paris, the capital of art, and soaked up the works of Manet, Gustave Courbet, and Toulouse-Lautrec, whose sketchy style impressed him greatly. Then it was back to Spain, a return to France, and again back to Spain - all in the years 1899 to 1904.

"Before he struck upon Cubism, Picasso went through a prodigious number of styles - realism, caricature, the Blue Period, and the Rose Period. The Blue Period dates from 1901 to 1904 and is characterized by a predominantly blue palette and subjects focusing on outcasts, beggars, and prostitutes. This was when he also produced his first sculptures. The most poignant work of the style is in Cleveland's Museum of Art, La Vie (1903), which was created in memory of a great childhood friend, the Spanish poet Casagemas, who had committed suicide. The painting started as a self-portrait, but Picasso's features became those of his lost friend. The composition is stilted, the space compressed, the gestures stiff, and the tones predominantly blue. Another outstanding Blue Period work, of 1903, is in the Metropolitan, The Blind Man's Meal. Yet another example, perhaps the most lyrical and mysterious ever, is in the Toledo Museum of Art, the haunting Woman with a Crow (1903).

"The Rose Period began around 1904 when Picasso's palette brightened, the paintings dominated by pinks and beiges, light blues, and roses. His subjects are saltimbanques (circus people), harlequins, and clowns, all of whom seem to be mute and strangely inactive. One of the premier works of this period is in Washington, D.C., the National Gallery's large and extremely beautiful Family of Saltimbanques dating to 1905, which portrays a group of circus workers who appear alienated and incapable of communicating with each other, set in a one-dimensional space.

"In 1905, Picasso went briefly to Holland, and on his return to Paris, his works took on a classical aura with large male and fernale figures seen frontally or in distinct profile, almost like early Greek art. One of the best of these of 1906 is in the Albright-Knox Gallery in Buffalo, NY, La Toilette. Several pieces in this new style were purchased by Gertrude (the art patron and writer) and her brother, Leo Stein. The other major artist promoted by the Steins during this period was Henri Matisse, who had made a sensation in an exhibition of 1905 for works of a most shocking new style, employing garish and dissonant colors. These pieces would be derided by the critics as "Fauvism," a French word for "wild beasts." Picasso was profoundly influenced by Matisse. He was also captivated by the almost cartoon-like works of the self-taught "primitive" French painter Henri "Le Douanier" Rousseau, whom he affectionately called "the last ancient Egyptian painter" because his works have a passing similarity to the flat ancient Egyptian paintings.

"A masterpiece by Rousseau is in the Museum of Modern Art in New York, his world-famous Sleeping Gypsy, with an incredible tiger gazing at the dormant figure with laser-like eyes.

"Picasso discovered ancient Iberian sculpture from Spain, African art (for he haunted the African collections in the Musée d'Ethnographie du Trocadéro in Paris), and Gauguin's sculptures. Slowly, he incorporated the simplified forms he found in these sources into a striking portrait of Gertrude Stein, finished in 1906 and given by her in her will to the Metropolitan Museum. She has a severe masklike face made up of emphatically hewn forms compressed inside a restricted space. (Stein is supposed to have complained, "I don't look at all like that," with Picasso replying, "You will, Gertrude, you will.") This unique portrait comes as a crucial shift from what Picasso saw to what he was thinking and paves the way to Cubism.

"Then came the awesome Les Demoiselles d'Avignon of 1907, the shaker of the art world (Museum of Modern Art, New York). Picasso was a little afraid of the painting and didn't show it except to a small circle of friends until 1916, long after he had completed his early Cubist pictures. Cubism is essentially the fragmenting of three-dimensional forms into flat areas of pattern and color, overlapping and intertwining so that shapes and parts of the human anatomy are seen from the front and back at the same time. The style was created by Picasso in tandem with his great friend Georges Braque, and at times, the works were so alike it was hard for each artist quickly to identify their own. The two were so close for several years that Picasso took to calling Braque, "ma femme" or "my wife," described the relationship as one of two mountaineers roped together, and in some correspondence they refer to each other as "Orville and Wilbur" for they knew how profound their invention of Cubism was.

"Every progressive painter, whether French, German, Belgian, or American, soon took up Cubism, and the style became the dominant one of at least the first half of the 20th century. In 1913, in New York, the new style was introduced at an exhibition at the midtown armory - the famous Armory Show - which caused a sensation. Picasso would create a host of Cubist styles throughout his long career. After painting still-lifes that employed lettering, trompe l'oeil effects, color, and textured paint surfaces, in 1912 Picasso produced Still-Life with Chair-Caning, in the Picasso Museum in Paris, which is an oval picture that is, in effect, a cafe table in perspective surrounded by a rope frame - the first collage, or a work of art that incorporates preexisting materials or objects as part of the ensemble. Elements glued to the surface contrasting with painted versions of the same material provided a sort of sophisticated double take on the part of the observer. A good example of this, dubbed Synthetic Cubism, is in the Picasso Museum, Paris, the witty Geometric Composition: The Guitar (1913). The most accomplished pictures of the fully developed Synthetic Cubist style are two complex and highly colorful works representing musicians (in Philadelphia and the Museum of Modern Art, New York). He produced fascinating theatrical sets and costumes for the Ballet Russe from 1914 on, turned, in the 1920s, to a rich classical style, creating some breathtaking line drawings, dabbled with Surrealism between 1925 and 1935, and returned to Classicism.

"At the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War, Picasso was appointed the director of the Prado. In January, 1937, the Republican government asked him to paint a mural for the Spanish pavilion at the world exposition in Paris. Spurred on by a war atrocity, the total destruction by bombs of the town of Guernica in the Basque country, he painted the renowned oil Guernica in monochrome (now in Madrid's Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofia.) Something of an enigma in details, there's no doubt that the giant picture (which until the death of Franco was in New York's Museum of Modern Art) expresses a Goyaesque revulsion over the horrors man can wreak upon fellow man. The center is dominated by a grieving woman and a wounded, screaming horse illuminated, like Goya's Third of May, 1808 by a harsh light.

"Picasso lived in Paris through the war, producing gloomy paintings in semi-abstract styles, many depicting skulls or flayed animals or a horrifying charnel house. He joined the Communist party after the war and painted two large paintings condemning the United States for its involvement in the Korean War (two frightfully bad paintings about events that never happened - like American participation in germ warfare). He turned enthusiastically to sculpture, pottery, and print-making, and, in his later years, preoccupied himself with a series of mistresses and girlfriends, changing his style to express his love for each one, and, finally, making superb evocations of the works of old masters like Diego Velazquez. Whatever Picasso had a hand in turned out to have an unquenchable spark of utter genius."

Situación Política

Cuando Napoleón toma el poder en Francia este no queria ser comparado con la monarquía. Estos últimos habían sido degollados en parte por sus excesos. El estilo de arte a ser adoptado por el emperador Napoleón fué uno clásico, como en la antigua Roma. Elegante y grandioso pero no extrovertido. Para decorar sus edificios contrata pintores que siguen estos ideales y valores de la Roma clásica.

El Estilo Neoclacisista

El estilo Neoclásico, como muchos otros hasta a mediados del siglo XX, se originó en Francia. Francia a sido reconocida desde el siglo XVII (17) como el centro de las artes en Europa. Este estilo comenzó en los 1700s y duró hasta a mediados de los 1800s.

Los Neoclasicistas fueron formados justo antes de la revolución Francesa. Ellos estaban comenzando a producir arte sin el patronaje de los reyes, al igual que los ciudadanos franceses estaban tratando de escapar de las ataduras de la servidumbre de los nobles. El principal artista Neoclásico lo fue Jackes Louis David. El fundó un nuevo estilo clásico basado en la antiguas reglas Grecia clásica de orden y moralidad. Esto se identifica en parte con la subida de la clase media en la escala social. El se identifico con la revolución francesa y se convirtió en su pintor descriptivo de esta. Su estilo surgió de su gran cocimiento de la literatura Griega y Romana, de la cual en muchas ocasiones tomó títulos prestados. Los valores de la revolución Francesa se semejan a los de Roma antes de convertirse en un imperio y el tono moral de su trabajo une estoas dos épocas de la historia.

La fuerza, firmeza y el control de sus composiciones, a veces reafirman una línea horizontal, como lo acostumbraban los antiguos Romanos en sus frescos y relieves. En el juramento de los Horatii, la claridad y los detalles realistas parecen anticipar la fotografía, mientras ignora la naturaleza verdadera de la pintura las cuales son en dos dimensiones, algo que será de gran interés a los pintores del próximo siglo.

Otros artistas como Ingres también trabajaron en este estilo aunque este usaba lineas curvilíneas. Revisen artchive.com para que vean sus obras como La Grande Odalisque la cual es muy sensual. Odalisque significa en turco concubina. Ingres el cual fue director de la academia de arte Francés demostraba ya un nuevo interés por cosas exóticas lejos del creciente materialismo de los tiempos y muy diferente de los valores Neoclacisistas. Esto va a ayudar al surgimiento de un nuevo estilo, el romanticismo.

Romanticismo:
Fue el primer grupo que rechazó el concepto del artista al servicio de los gustos de la clase media, o a los aristocráticos que habían sobrevivido la revolución. Ellos fueron los primeros artistas revolucionarios del arte moderno ya que dejaron de seguir las ordenes de los patrones y sus gustos para concentrarse en el verdadero valor de la obra de arte por su propio valor. Los verdaderos revolucionarios artísticos saben que no siempre hay que buscar o complacer una audiencia. Si hay valores que valgan la pena la gente eventualmente se dará cuenta y será convencida de esto. Esto ha sido la base fundamental del arte moderno. Ahora el artista Romántico no tiene un patrón que encargase un cuadro de antemano y tiene que buscar un cliente y mercados para sus obras. Pero tiene libertad creativa para que el artista exprese sus ideas, a veces en formas no tradicionales.

Los artistas más importantes del periodo lo son Delacroix de Francia, Goya de España y Turner de Inglaterra. Goya fue el primero comenzando a trabajar en los 1700s. Las obras románticas comparten ciertas cosas en común como es que son basadas en literatura dramática y exótica, noticias e historia.

Técnicamente los románticos explotaron las texturas del óleo y su habilidad para crear colores brillantes y fuertes contrastes de valores. Estas técnicas cambiaron el interés de la pieza de el tema como tal hacia una atención a la forma y a los materiales usados por el artista, algo que prevalece en el siglo XX. La forma en que los Románticos utilizaron la pintura fue un gran contraste de la forma suave y lisa utilizada por los Neoclasicistas. Ellos gustaban de composiciones atrevidas y asimétricas como las que había hecho Rembrandt o Rubens en el siglo XVII (17).


lita.jpg

Pollock was an individual impatient with anything other than the most direct route to a goal. This is typical of someone severely injured early on by life. Pollock was born strangled by the cord, an event that left him with mild learning and motor disabilities, and most probably, a precocious vulnerability to alcohol. Such persons tend always to be seeking, at least unconsciously, the reasons for their affliction. The outward manifestation of this is what I call an aggressive essentialism. It is the psychological equivalent of political radicalization: that is, when a person is so afflicted by injustice that life is meaningless until equity is restored. Restoring equity, for Pollock then, was to get to the bottom of things at the cost of all intervening superficialities. In Pollock's art, this is symbolized by the laying bare of the historical process by which each work was created. Its stages are clearly visible, most often literally "down to the weave" of the canvas -- thus the title of the lecture, and the book I am writing.

No artist among the Abstract Expressionists is more open about revealing the stages that led up to the surface we see. This vertical directionality down to the weave, distinct from any device of perspective (though at times contributing to the spatial drama of the work), is the hallmark of the way Pollock painted.

But people want to know what Pollock’s works mean? This begs the question of what "meaning" means when interpreting Pollock. Here, I would suggest, meaning is the sum total of three things:


1. what you feel on first encountering the work,
2. what you can see of the qualities of the work that made you feel as you did,
3. what you can know about the work’s imagery and intent, and the historical origins and context from which, and in which, it was created.

The point to stress here is that the first levels of relevant information in the quest for meaning are visceral and visual, not verbal. These are the realities that I think have been forgotten in the current "literature" on Pollock -- and most serious art. Indeed, one must come to the sad conclusion that for many historians, biographers and critics today, the works of art are not real as objects -- only the theory of explanation is real. This lack of empathy -- this inability to share in another's emotions or feelings -- this inability to see, and through perception, to feel through what is actually there in the art work, but instead to assert only what theory requires to be there -- makes all too much recent art commentary tendentiously distortive, unenlightening, and ultimately useless.

What follows applies the method just described in the reviews of the show and its catalogue, and in the commentaries on specific works.

Revise artchive.com